The integrated schedule lives in several places.
What it costs: Milestones slip across contractors, and the program office learns late.
Program management, PMO, and governance support for federal program offices and prime contractors, scoped as fixed-price deliverables or as a workstream under a prime.
Federal programs rarely fail for lack of a plan. They lose time where the plan meets execution: across contractors, in reporting, and in decisions that wait too long.
What it costs: Milestones slip across contractors, and the program office learns late.
What it costs: Staff time goes to formatting instead of managing risk.
What it costs: Issues reach leadership after the options have narrowed.
What it costs: Deliverables diverge from what the contracting officer will accept.
What it costs: Handoffs between vendors create gaps no one owns.
What it costs: The program cannot show progress in the terms its oversight reviews require.
The Program Management Improvement Accountability Act of 2016 set government-wide expectations for program management. GAO's review of its implementation found the structure in place and the execution uneven.
The Program Management Improvement Accountability Act requires government-wide program management standards and Program Management Improvement Officers at CFO Act agencies.
GAO-20-44, December 2019CFO Act agencies had received OMB portfolio reviews when GAO assessed implementation.
GAO-20-44, December 2019GAO high-risk areas had been covered by the required program reviews at the time of the assessment.
GAO-20-44, December 2019Program offices that meet these expectations do it with an integrated plan, a working governance rhythm, and reporting tied to outcomes.
Work is scoped as defined deliverables with acceptance criteria, whether delivered directly to a program office or as a workstream under a prime contractor.
One schedule across contractors and government teams, with dependencies and critical path visible and owned.
Standards, templates, and a governance rhythm sized to the program, aligned with agency program management policy.
A single register for risks, issues, and decisions, each with an owner, a date, and an escalation path.
Monthly status, dashboards, and leadership briefings built from one source, focused on progress, risk, and decisions needed.
Requirements traced from the statement of work to deliverables and acceptance criteria, so work stays in scope and deliverables are accepted.
A shared operating rhythm across vendors and government teams, with responsibilities and handoffs written down.
Measures tied to program objectives, with baselines, targets, and reviews that show whether the program is delivering.
Transition plans, documentation, and closeout deliverables that leave the program office able to run what was built.
Each is scoped with defined deliverables and acceptance criteria. SAM.gov registered, UEI EL3KXJ8JBLP4, CAGE 24UV6.
Confirm scope, deliverables, acceptance criteria, and points of contact with the program office or prime.
OutputAn approved work plan and governance rhythmConsolidate the schedule, risks, and reporting, and establish where the program actually stands.
OutputAn integrated schedule and a risk and decision registerOperate the governance rhythm, produce reporting, and bring decisions forward on time.
OutputDeliverables accepted and milestones metDocument the processes and hand the work to the program office or the next phase.
OutputTransition documentation and closeoutThree weeks and a fixed fee. A clear account of what is slowing the work down, what it costs, and an action plan with owners.
How it works Defined engagementA written scope, agreed deliverables, and acceptance criteria. Delivered with your team and handed over when it is running.
Discuss a project OngoingNeed senior ownership of this work now? Bring in a fractional PMO or transformation lead on a defined mandate, with a clear reporting line and a planned handover.
Fractional rolesYes. A program management workstream can be delivered under a prime, with deliverables, acceptance criteria, and points of contact written into the teaming agreement.
Primary NAICS 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services), with 541618 as an additional code. Program management support typically falls under PSC R408, with R499 and R410 for related professional and program evaluation work.
Yes. Deliverables are defined with acceptance criteria, which suits fixed-price task orders and performance-based scopes.
The capability statement summarizes measured results from operations, program, and governance work in legal, investment, and complex enterprise environments. Performance references are provided in proposals and on request.
Tell us the clearance and access requirements at the start. We will confirm directly and early whether we can meet them, so no one's time is wasted.
The Operating Diagnostic is a three-week, fixed-fee look at how the work actually runs. It tells you whether the fix is a process, a decision, a system, or all three, and gives you an action plan either way.